Friday, May 16, 2008
Kant "math"
So in the beginning of the book, Kant talks about analytic and synthetic. Since I am a math major, I found the part on math the most interesting. Kant goes on and describes math a synthetic a priori. I am actually kinda confused by this. To me you can observe math but to really understand it I think you need to have hands on experience. Yes you can believe someone when they say that 1+3=4, but truely, without explaining it, one would not understand why. By showing someone on a numberline (as demonstrated in class) you can say that if you start at 1 and move three more numbers to the positive side, then you will end up at four. Someone could simply remember this equation, but by memorizing it they would not be able to see that 4 - 1=3 or that 4 -3=1. So I am not really sure if i agree with Kant that math is just observed.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Math must be observed and understood. in the great words of my lousy high school physics teacher, "you must understand the concepts". As bad of a teacher he was, that one statement works perfectly with this dilemma. memorizing certain equations is one thing, but understanding why the answer is so or why a problem works out a certain way is much more important than memorization. anyone can memorize an equation or an answer, but the important part is if they know how or why it is so, thus math needs to be taught and learned.
Post a Comment